Cowboys ‘Punish’ McCarthy: Truth of No Contract Extension from Jerry - Sport News

Cowboys ‘Punish’ McCarthy: Truth of No Contract Extension from Jerry

FRISCO – In a “new report” on the job security of Mike McCarthy, ESPN both regurgitates old news and puts a weirdly positive spin on a Dallas Cowboys decision that by any measure is a “jury-is-out” situation.

In response to one of the one of the most shocking and disappointing ends to a season in the franchise’s storied 64-year history, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones on Wednesday night chose to retain McCarthy as his head coach.

Dallas Cowboys head coach Mike McCarthy could receive contract extension -  Blogging The Boys

As we wrote that night: “By deciding to retain his head coach and make him work next season with no job security and on the final year his contract, Jones essentially is making McCarthy … coach the Cowboys as a lame duck.”

We were told that. We told you that. But four days later, we’ve got Adam Schefter of ESPN telling you he’s got “sources” saying it.

We will say this: Four days late, Schefter’s “sources” are correct.

Related content

Meanwhile, we quoted directly Jones explaining his decision: “I believe this team is very close and capable of achieving our ultimate goals and the best step forward for us will be with Mike McCarthy as our head coach. There is great benefit to continuing the team’s progress under Mike’s leadership as our head coach. … I am 100-percent supportive of him as our head coach and ability to reach our goals.”

That’s it. Because we know that Jones’ plan before the devastating loss to Green Bay was to give McCarthy a contract extension, and because we know the loss dried up that scheduled offer, this amounts to “punishment” for the coach.

ESPN is trying to twist it into something else, Schefter noting that Jones’ view is that “the last year of a contract … can it often can bring out the best in people.”

That’s true. But McCarthy isn’t a lame duck because it’s advantageous for him. He’s not getting an extension because an extension represents a reward that he did not earn.

Related Posts

Proposed Trаde Sends Cowboys ‘Hіgһ-Potentіаl’ 13-Sаck Pаss Rusһer

The Dallas Cowboys could be in the market to replace some departed pass rushers. In a trade proposed by Bleacher Report’s Alex Ballentine, the Cowboys could benefit…

Hааson Reddіck trаde: Eаgles deаl pаss rusһer to tһe Jets for less tһаn you’d tһіnk

The writing had been on the wall for awhile, but with the addition of Bryce Huff and a restructured deal for Josh Sweat, Haason Reddick was on…

Dіscussіon: Wһіcһ plаyers’ jersey do you wаnt wһen Lіons unveіl new unіforms?

It’s finally almost here. Despite no actual football being played, April is going to be a huge month for the Detroit Lions. On top of being the…

Insіder Reveаls Cowboys’ Plаns For Dаk Prescott

No team was more disappointing in the NFL playoffs than the second-seeded Dallas Cowboys, who many believed could go the distance and potentially win the Super Bowl….

Analyst Expects Browns To Make Changes To Their Defensive Backfield

Recently, the NFL raised the salary cap for each team to $255.4 million. That helped several clubs keep their prized players while also bringing in good free…

49ers sіgn Lіons TE to RFA offer sһeet

The Lions tendered Brock Wright as a restricted free agent earlier this month, keeping the young tight end around. The team did not use a second-round tender,…