RHONJ: Judge Dismisses Indictment Against Thomas Manzo After Attack on Ex Dina Manzo’s Husband Dave Cantin, Details Revealed

A judge dismisses the indictment against Dina Manzo’s ex-husband Thomas Manzo following an attack on the RHONJ alum.

RHONJ: Judge Dismisses Indictment Against Thomas Manzo After Attack on Ex Dina Manzo’s Husband Dave Cantin, Details Revealed #RHONJ

Credit: Instagram

Thomas Manzo’s three-count indictment was dismissed by a federal judge.

The dismissal was based on the grounds that the Speedy Trial Act was violated. The judge dismissed it without prejudice, which means the government must now get a new indictment if they choose to re-prosecute.

The indictment claimed that Thomas asked John Perna to arrange an assault on Real Housewives of New Jersey star Dina Manzo’s now-husband David Cantin, using John’s crime family connections. As an alleged payment, John used Thomas’ Brownstone wedding venue (with a large discount) for his daughter’s wedding.

Per NorthJersey.com, prosecutors claimed John and a crewmember assaulted David with a slapjack in July of 2015. The wedding took place a month later. Other members of the Lucchese crime family also allegedly attended.

Thomas’ attorneys argued that the government did not start the trial in the timeframe established by the federal mandate for a speedy trial. U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton agreed, pointing out that a dozen motions delayed the trial after Thomas was indicted by a grand jury in 2020.

Per the outlet, the trial was delayed because of the pandemic, complications from the case and discovery, as well as the termination of several of Thomas’ defense attorneys.

The judge could have dismissed it with prejudice – meaning the government could not re-file charges against him – but Wigenton said she did not because the “charged offenses are unquestionably serious.”

She added that the delays did not “suggest bad faith or a pattern of neglect by the government. Nor does defendant point to any. Instead, defendant’s sole — and conclusory — argument is that the delay was substantial and, thus, inherently prejudicial. This Court is not persuaded.”

“While the delay was certainly substantial, defendant expressly requested it,” she added, “he asked the government to hold off on prosecuting this action until he resolved his criminal case in state court.”

Related Posts

Bachelor Joey Graziadei’s Family Guide: Meet the Season 28 Star’s Parents and 2 Sisters

Becoming the Bachelor has made Joey Graziadei’s “amazing” family closer than ever — and that was evident when they made an appearance on The Bachelor season 28 finale on Monday,…

Matt James Reveals He’s ‘Planning On’ Marrying Rachael Kirkconnell

Bachelor Nation couple Matt James and Rachael Kirkconnell found love on Season 25 of “The Bachelor.” Since their time on the show, the couple has been keeping…

Multiple DWTS Cast Members Confirmed For Season 33

“Dancing With the Stars” will officially return for a 33rd season in fall 2024—with some familiar faces back in the ballroom. On May 10, 2024, Variety confirmed…

Gerry Turner Marks His ‘Favorite Time of the Year’ in First Instagram Post Since Divorce News

Gerry Turner is looking forward to the summertime. On May 9, the Golden Bachelor star, 72, made his return to Instagram nearly a month after the news…

The Bachelor Season 29 Renewed By ABC As Bachelor In Paradise’s Future Remains Unknown

The Bachelor season 29 has been announced by ABC, but the fate of Bachelor in Paradise season 10 is still unknown. The Bachelor season 29 follows in the footsteps of Joey Graziadei’s Bachelor season, which was…

Charity Lawson Suffers Injury That Sends Her to the Hospital in an Ambulance Before DWTS Finale: ‘I’m Scared’

Charity Lawson nearly didn’t make it to the Dancing with the Stars finale. The Bachelorette alum revealed on Tuesday’s episode of the ABC dancing competition series that…

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *